Eruption appears to be optimal given the chances, the moment and the setting when it happens, again and again. "suboptimal conditions" is rather generalised. Older flows are merely tolerated or purposely ignored. Unlike hoarding, the affection with "Lava flow" is low. Instead of ruining a car one risks ruining a city. Unlike the wheel reinvented, "Lava flow" cannot be dug out without the risk of catastrophic cave-ins. Unlike cancer or a bubble, the pieces of a "Lava flow" do not (fail to) propagate, but are buried frozen solid beneath new lava flows. Unlike big ball of mud, "Lava flow" is stable, allowing "Lava flow" to happen over larger timespans. "Lava flow" is where the goal is resurfacing, but unintended solid landfill happens over time. 207.135.146.176 ( talk) 16:11, (UTC) Reply Original URLS for links ĭo we preserve the original URLs if we are providing an archived version of a page AND the original URL domain is now a porn site? ![]() Shinobu 08:16, 15 November 2006 (UTC) Reply Ryan Roos 01:31, 15 November 2006 (UTC) Reply Link: I haven't read through these, but I think we can say that it does exist. The third paragraph reads like it was written by a disgruntled computer programmer.since there is no explanation for the relationship between lava flow and nsapi, I am going to remove it Quickie ( talk) 11:39, 6 October 2008 (UTC) Reply.The second paragraph sites NSAPI as an example of this behavior without explaining why it is a good example (if it is).Other than pages that copy Wikipedia minus the volcano related articles. ![]() No sources or references are sited and after a quick search I could not find any.Some reasons why I think this article could use some improvement.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |